Actually, I did have a couple of V8’s back when Triceratops still roamed the highways and byways. But after some recent action and adventure in my anemic little S10, I found myself pining for the old, “Detroit Iron” days with every hill I had to drive over. On every down slope, I thought back on my V8’s with a fondness I reserve for old lovers.
My first was a ’77 Mustang. It was pure fuckulance wrapped around a lovely 302 (that’s 302 cubic inches for all you young’ns). I could do brake-stands without using the brake. I’d just stomp the pedal, the ass-end would skip off the pavement, and she would come down in all her howling glory. Sold it to an exchange student for 500 bucks and went to a ’76 Aspen SE. That one hauled a fair amount of ass as well. It had 318 under the hood, but a craptastic carb. It would flood out if you took a corner too quickly. And just like old lovers, you forget their foibles over time and only remember the good. In the years since the Late Cretaceous Period, I’ve had nothing but wimpy little four-bangers. My ’77 Porsche 924 was the exception. It was pure sex. It had four cylinders but they were four, very big cylinders. But even so, it lacked the thing I love most about V8 engines: raw power. And a big, warm, throaty sound.
You know, I picked up “Mad Max” a while ago and dropped it in the DVD player. I turned on my speakers and…there it was. There was that F-U rumble and howl I had forgotten since the world moved on. I closed my eyes and soaked it all in. I remembered putting the pedal to the metal and being shoved back in my seat as I blew past a semi. I remembered the vibrating thrum that would come through the carpet on the tranny hump, assuring me all was right with the world. How I skipped and danced when I heard an Olds 455 Rocket fire up for the first time! How I loved watching the hood come up when my buddy with a 351 Windsor downshifted into passing gear! How giddy my fear was when the air-induction on my sister’s Camaro opened up, flooding her 350 four barrel with speed and win! (It’s true. My sister ROCKS!)
Anyhow, I have come to believe that the North American car industry died not this past fall, but when poets (with big effin nuts) stopped making cars. The bean counters and marketing folks took my lovers away from me around the time Lee Iacocca found his desk at Chrysler.
“But Ringmaster, with new tech and new alloys, you can get the same or greater horsepower with a quarter the size and less fuel to boot!”
It’s true. I can. I can also change this:
“Two roads diverged in a yellow wood,
And sorry I could not travel both
And be one traveler, long I stood And looked down one as far as I could” (Thank you Mr. Frost)
To this:
“There’s this fork in the road. I wanted to travel both at the same time but couldn’t. I was sad about it.”
See what I mean?
Sure I could “drift” all “fast and furious”. It’s not the same. New cars can do stuff, but they don’t make me feel stuff.
You wanna save the North American auto industry? Hire poets.

15 comments
Comments feed for this article
July 31, 2009 at 12:28 am
Neo
i agree Ringmaster. Wholeheartedly. There is little thats more gratifying in the world than hearing that”about to stall” low rumble of a big fucken V8 and then the quiet hush before you slam the pedal to the floor. less than a moment later hearing that fucken bark as the demon engine roars is earger roar. y’know, driving a V8, to me, is like watching 300. i know that there are more efficienct and practical ways of doing the same task, but it certainly lacks the adrenaline and pure “balls to the wall” of an old school muscle car. sure the new muscle is better on gas, and more efficiently designed, but if you can show me a modern car that demands the same respect as a 1969 Dodge Charger with a 440 under the hood, i will never say another word on the matter. and i don’t even wanna get going about how horny i get driving a car like that, because i don’t think the Ringmaster wants to read about it. Mad Max is great by the way, post apocalyptic muscle.
July 31, 2009 at 12:29 am
Neo
again, going back to mention one of your previous posts; why a kind and loing god will never let me win the lottery. because i would lay fucken rubber all over North America.
July 31, 2009 at 7:11 am
Viper Pilot
Again, I really think Australia is the place for you. V8s are a way of life here.
There’s a a particular race here that I have not been to called the Bathurst 1000.
It’s part of the V8 Supercars touring series, which is, as you might guess, full of V8 supercars. This race is notorious for the track being on a bigass hill, making for plenty of blind rises, and for the Mad Max-esque quality of a special section of the crowd area, imaginatively called ‘The Hill’. It’s calmed down a bit in recent as they only let each person take 24 beers in each day now, but I’ve heard many a tale of the post-apocalyptic rampages that go on upon the hill. They chant and drink and fight and set cars on fire – sometimes cars intended for that purpose but not always. I think it must kind of be like that movie about the island that’s turned into a prison.
Oh, right, the V8s. Yeah, there are lots of Holden (GM) and Ford V8s on the roads here. New, old, whatever. It’s kind of cool to pull up to a Ford Falcon on the roads here and if it’s old enough, it kinda looks like The Last of the Interceptors…
July 31, 2009 at 12:24 pm
spdrcln
I agree…I love the feel and the sound of a big, throaty V8…I see one… I want one… then the enviro-guilt hits me and I know I’ll never have one again. It’s a sacrifice I will make, but at least I have the memories. It’s better to have loved and lost and all that…
July 31, 2009 at 2:53 pm
The Hillside Circus
Viper – thanks for the awesome link. I just about *pee’d*! I think I just might have to look for work in Aus. Beer, football, Bathurst…How do you say “redneck” in Aus? (haha)
And that 8000km highway that would be awesome for a “V8 Interceptor” of my own. I’d need a big blower on it though…
They used to make and sell Falcons over here in the late 60′s I believe. Not sure if they’re the same vehicles as Aus, but I sure liked the look of ‘em. Don’t quote me, but I think the Falcon was replaced over here by the Maverick / Comet. If someone wants to Google all that, be my guest. Mavs / Comets are the perfect sleepers, IMHO. They look like Grandaddy’s “go get the mail” car…but they’re light little buggers with 302′s. If you’re handy with a wrench? You could drop a 351 in them. Then pull up beside a ‘Stang and start waving 20′s.
Great way to put the kids through college.
Enviro-guilt? All those Smart Cars on the road nowdays would just subsidize my own self-indulgent, V8 tom-foolery.
July 31, 2009 at 3:15 pm
spdrcln
I think that the Falcon in Aus is – or was at one time – a mustang by another name…
July 31, 2009 at 3:18 pm
spdrcln
http://jalopnik.com/362495/
July 31, 2009 at 3:30 pm
The Hillside Circus
’76 Maverick with 351 Windsor crammed into it. Almost pron.
August 1, 2009 at 3:53 am
Viper Pilot
I don’t know that I’d ever have called my mom’s Comet ‘light’. But, I guess compared to, say, a Dart (hi, Coyote!) they certainly would be.
August 1, 2009 at 12:41 pm
Coyote
The Dart wasn’t a V8. It was a Slant6. No where near as powerful, but the dart had a fairly light body (comparitively) and got some good power. Indestructible engine is the big one for the Slant 6.
Now my Monte Carlo. That bitch had balls. A whole bag of them. I occasionally fed them into the gas tank. She was awesome.
August 3, 2009 at 9:25 pm
The Hillside Circus
When speaking of cars up to the mid to late 70′s, “light” is a relative term. The mid 70′s Comet / Maverick was, IMHO, light compared to say a 75 Impala and that ilk.
A gear head I know says the Maverick came stock with a 6 cylinder, but had a 302 variant called the Grabber or something.
August 18, 2009 at 7:00 pm
Neo
you are correct Ringmaster. the 302 variant of the Maverick was dubbed a “Grabber”. similar idea as say a Dart “swinger” (which had a 318 or a 383 if memory serves me correctly) and the like. since i am not much a Ford muscle kind of guy, i am not too sure about much else. comparitively though, they were similar in weight to a Mustang since they are basically the same chassis. something like a ’69 Charger or a ’70 Chevelle would be significantly heavier.
August 18, 2009 at 7:01 pm
Neo
addendum. i “think” that the 6 cylinder version was a 289 but don’t quote me on that. a 289 might have been a Chevy engine.
August 18, 2009 at 7:39 pm
The Hillside Circus
For some reason I seem to recall the late 60′s “Stangs” had 287s. I could Google all this but frankly I’m up to my armpits in toddlers right now.
I’m so close to having a look for a Maverick right now…
Mid-life crisis? I imagine my wife coming home to a 76 Mav in the driveway would be a lot like that scene in “American Beauty”. You know…
“I’ve wanted that car since I was a kid. I now have it. I RULE!”
I’ve also considered dropping a 4.3 Vortec in the truck…but the cost of doing engine, tranny, diff, posi-trac etc etc etc. would be more than the truck is worth. And as it’s not a “Lil Red Express Truck” or anything (faster than Corvettes those things!), it’s just not worth it.
Here’s a taste of 360 4 barrel. I could be to the dump and back in no time!
April 26, 2010 at 6:51 pm
A Mad, Hillside Fancy « The Hillside Circus
[...] Yessir, as Neo can attest to, my thoughts have been dwelling on bikes and engines and all things horsepower lately. Is it Spring? Is it mid-life crisis? Is it just the sheer boredom of a domesticated day-to-day? Is it simmering self-resentment that I put a smaller differential in my truck last summer? [...]